U.S FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
[“THE” SUPREME COURT OF COVER]
Carol Kam filed a Civil Rights violation suit in U.S Federal District Court aganst the State of Texas and Dallas County in January 2018. In June of 2018 she also filed a personal Civil Rights Violation suit against John B Peyton Jr , as he failed to have jurisdiction to oversee the original trial in July 2013 and the rehearing in October 2013. Without Jurisdiction, he did not have immunity.
Carols claimed and proved the following:
1] There was no valid Order of Referral for John B Peyton Jr. to oversee the trial and the rehearing as required per State Law.
2] The Order by John B Peyton Jr. is not a complete legal instrument as the Court of Record has not signed the proposed Peyton Orders as required by State Law.
3] Carol was denied the deposition of the Pediatrician, at the rehearing, who Pyke claimed had medical knowledge of Robert Kam’s Capacity on March 17, 2011 in David Pyke’s office at the time of the alleged signing of the illegal Amended Trust created by Pyke. The Medical Records showed no record of this Pediatrician ever treating Robert. Pyke’s paralegals, who were pressured by Pyke to illegally sign as witnesses to the signature of this Pediatrician, confirmed, under oath, that this doctor had “never” been in Pyke’s office … at anytime. John B Peyton Jr. knew Pyke’s conduct represented a Fraud and denied Carol this Deposition as it would further incriminate and expose misconduct by Pyke.
Dallas County Attorneys, representing both Dallas County and John B Peyton Jr. and an Attorney from the Texas State Attorney General’s Office, representing State of Texas, simply argued that Peyton Rulings were valid without addressing the absence of a valid Order of Referral and without sign off by the Court to set the effective date and finalize the Order, all as required by State Law. The Federal Courts accepted the State and County’s completely unsupported arguments and relied on the Rooker Feldman Doctrine that one can not take a State Ruling to a Federal Court for relief.
Without the Court’s sign off on the proposed Order, the ruling remains incomplete and the Federal Court position is completely void of logic.
The Federal courts employing the “Fillmore Doctrine”, ignored the complete absence of proof for the State’s Claim of a valid ruling, failed to address the denial of Carol’s right to depose the Pediatrician that had been deemed a medical expert during the trial and failed to address the documented complete absence of authority of Peyton to be in the Courtroom for the hearings.
In Carol’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari for both the State / County Case [U.S Federal Supreme Court Case # 19-31] and the personal suit on John B. Peyton Jr. [U.S Federal Supreme Court Case # 19-479] she fully documented the denial of her Civil right to have a fair trial per State Law and noted the failure of Dallas County and the State of Texas to prove Peyton’s Authority and the legitimacy of the unsigned order. The State failed to even address the Civil Rights violation of Carol’s denial to depose the Pediatrician deemed a medical expert by Pyke.
The Supreme Court denied both Writs of Certiorari which has established new legal precedent that an individual does not have to have authority, per state law, to oversee a trial, and that a “proposed” order by such an individual which the State requires to be signed by the Court of Record, represents a valid State ruling which triggers the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine. The denial also established new legal precedent that an individaul does not have the right to depose a medical doctor, claimed by the opposing party to have intimate medical knowledge of “capacity” in the execution and validty of a Will.
The absence of logic in the ruling via the Denials of the Writ of Certoriorari is remarkable and can only be explained by the Court’s maintenance of a Culture of Cover for the illegal and improper activities of John B Peyton Jr., whom the State of Texas has deemed to be unfit to be a Judge.
The following Correspondence has been sent to the Clerk for the Supreme Court of the United States asking for the individuals who “covered” for the denial of an individual’s Civil right to a Fair trial in order to protect the misconduct and illegal activities of an individual illegitimately presiding in a trial and creating incomplete legal documents again, whom the State of Texas has deemed unfit to be a Judge.
The legitimacy of the Judicial Branch of this Goverment is in question when the Culture of Cover extends to the highest court in the land at the expense of an innocent citizen.
The Fillmore Doctrine is attributed to former Dallas Appeal Court Judge Robert Fillmore:
Former Dallas Appeal Court Judge Robert Fillmore provided ”cover” for the misconduct of John B Peyton Jr. in multiple cases by completely ignoring issues presented to the court or by significantly delaying a verdict on it if it would expose and confirm misconduct by John B Peyton Jr..
The doctrine represents a position taken by a court to specifically not address, obfiscate, or significantly delay any ruling on an issue presented to them which may expose the misconduct of an Officer of the Court they wish to provide protection and / or “cover”.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Scott S Harris, Clerk April 11, 2020
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington D.C.
29543-001
201-479-3011
RE: Case # 19-31 [Carol Kam v Dallas County and the State of Texas] and Case # 19-479 [Carol Kam v John B Peyton Jr.*]
Dear Mr Harris.
The Federal Supreme Court denied the Writ of Certiorari for the two cases noted.
Both of the Writs were professionally produced and in full accordance with Federal Court Guidelines.
Both Writs clearly showed the denial Carol’s Federal Civil Right to a Fair Trial in accordance with State Law by Dallas County, the State of Texas and John B. Peyton Jr.*.
Carol proved, with complete support documentation, that John B Peyton Jr. *, failed to have authority to be in the Dallas Probate courtroom in July and October 2013. John B Peyton Jr.*, Dallas County, and the State of Texas failed to provide this court, and any Federal Court, with any valid Order of Referral which is required by State law for an Associate Judge to hold a trial and create a proper order.
Carol proved, with complete documentation, that the proposed orders by John B. Peyton Jr.* remain unsigned by the Court and that by state law, in 4 separate sections, sign off by the court of Record, is required to set the effective date of the Order and make the proposed order a legal instrument. John B Peyton Jr.*, Dallas County, and the State of Texas never provided this court or any Federal Court an order by Peyton* that had been signed by the Court, as required by State Law.
Carol, proved with complete documentation, that she was denied the deposition of a medical doctor, deemed by the Original Defendant to be a medical expert, with first hand knowledge of the capacity of Robert Kam at the time Robert Kam allegedly signed the illegal Amendments to an active Irrrevocable Trust created by the inept, incompetent, and unprofessional conduct of Dallas Probate Attorney, David Pyke. Carol has a Civil Right to depose a designated Medical Expert in a Case involving Capacity of an individual allegedly signing a Trust. John B Peyton Jr,* Dallas County and the State of Texas never provided this court with any argument as to why a critical deposition and Carol’s Civil Right to a fair trial was denied.
It appears that the Federal Court is extremely gullible and or predisposed to sustain a “Culture of Cover “ for the misconduct of Officers of the Court and political entities at the expense of the Civil Rights of an innocent citizen. Under either scenario, the current Federal Court system has a significant issue with “integrity”.
This Country deserves an explanation on why the highest court in the land would risk a reputation of legitimacy to Cover for the gross misconduct of rogue individuals within a State Court system including an individual that you had full knowledge of, that the State of Texas has deemed to be unfit to be a Judge .
Along with the explanation, please provide a list of the Supreme Court Judges which evaluated these cases and supported the “Cover” for the misconduct of John B. Peyton Jr * and the Texas State Court System, and the denial of Carol Kam’s Civil Right to a Fair Trial.
Once I receive this explanation I will post it, along with this correspondence for all to see on the new website “CultureofCover.com” which I have created to document my sister’s plight for Justice and the collapse of the Texas State and Federal Court systems. I will also submit your response to the President and the U. S. Congress along with my commentary which I will publish on the website and forward to you.
After Carol experienced the complete collapse of integrity within the Dallas Federal District Court and complete collapse of integrity within the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, Carol filed a suit in a Dallas State District Court to void the Judgement, due to lack of authority and failure of the Probate Court to sign off. The State District Court recognized issues within the Dallas Probate and State Court Systems but claimed she [Judge Tonya Parker ] could not rule on the “failure to follow law” as she felt it as was not within her Jurisdiction. She advised Carol to refile in the Dallas Probate Court and the Dallas Appeal Court which Carol did in October, 2019 and November, 2019.
The Dallas Probate Court ignored the request and Carol then filed two cases with the Dallas Appeal Court. One was an Appeal on the original proposed Order by John B. Peyton Jr.* from 2013 and the second was a Writ of Mandamus for the Appeal Court to force the Dallas Probate court to sign the proposed Peyton* Order as required by State Law.
On April 10, 2020, the Dallas Appeal Court ruled that it was too late to ask for the Writ. Carol will be asking for clarification of this ruling to determine if it was too late as the proposed Peyton* 2013 orders are now more than 30 days old and 2 provisions of State Law require that the Court sign off within 30 days .
On April 10, 2020, the Appeal Court also ruled that they could not address the Appeal on the proposed Peyton* Orders as they were not appealable because they had not been signed by the Dallas Probate Court, as clearly required by State Law and as pleaded in Carol’s Case to Federal court. This exact question was previously asked in Carol’s 2015 to 2017 Bill of Review and was “ignored” by the Dallas Probate Court, the Dallas Appeal Court, and the Texas State Supreme Court. The recent Dallas Appeal Court Ruling is attached.
Carol now has a document confirming that the proposed orders by Peyton* were incomplete. All the arguments made by Dallas County, John B Peyton Jr*, and the Texas State Attorney General that the unsigned proposed Peyton* Orders were complete legal Instruments per State Law that would support a defense based on the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine were completely false statements to the Federal Courts. The Federal Court’s acceptance of this doctrine without having a valid complete Ruling based on State Law was baseless and completely without logic.
I trust that this court will sanction all the representatives for Dallas County, the State of Texas and John B Peyton Jr* for failure to provide the Federal court system with the truth in their pleadings. Please notify me and the Country of your efforts to discipline these individuals.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Thomas W. Kam P.E.
7621 Spicewood Springs Road
Austin, Texas 78759
512-219-1574
tom@tkaustin.com
Cc: Andy Cockle
Cockle Legal Briefs
2311 Douglas Street
Omaha, Ne. 68102
Carol Kam
D Magazine
Texas Monthly
- John B Peyton Jr. is a former Judge whom the State of Texas has deemed unfit to be a Judge
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Scott Harris May 12, 2020
It has been a month since I sent the April 11, 2020 letter and I have not received any response.
You should be able to quickly provide me a list of all the individuals in your Court who reviewed and ruled on the two Writs.
You should also be able to provide me a quick progress report on the Court’s effort to sanction the County and State Representatives who lied to this Court on my sister’s cases .
I will keep the Country informed of your response via the website.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely
Thomas W Kam